Broken Function Level Authorization

Remediation: Broken Function Level Authorization in Go (Gin) [GHSA-7jm2-g593-4qrc]

[Updated May 2026] Updated GHSA-7jm2-g593-4qrc

Overview

Broken Function Level Authorization (BFLA) vulnerabilities in API backends arise when an application allows access to high-privilege actions by dispatching on a client-specified function identifier, or by grouping multiple actions behind a single endpoint with only broad authentication. In Go web apps built with Gin, this often looks like a single /invoke endpoint that picks which operation to perform based on a function name passed by the client, while the authorization check only confirms the user is logged in, not whether they are allowed to run that particular function. Real-world impact includes privilege escalation and data exposure: an ordinary user could trigger admin-level actions such as deleting resources, exporting sensitive data, or changing ownership, simply by requesting a different function name. Because the function-level permission is not evaluated, backend logic can run unintended paths, potentially bypassing resource ownership checks and tenant isolation. How this manifests in Gin: developers may implement a dynamic dispatch pattern or a shared endpoint that uses a function map to decide what to call, and apply a generic authentication middleware only. If the mapping relies on client input, attackers can craft requests to exercise functions they shouldn't, especially when there is no per-function check or when resources are not scoped to the caller. Remediation approach: enforce per-function authorization checks, adopt explicit endpoints for sensitive actions, implement RBAC/ABAC, avoid trusting client-supplied function identifiers, and add tests to verify that each action is allowed only for appropriate roles.

Code Fix Example

Go (Gin) API Security Remediation
package main

import (
  "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)

type User struct { ID int; Role string }

func main() {
  r := gin.Default()
  // Simple auth middleware: expects X-Role header to set user role
  r.Use(func(c *gin.Context) {
    role := c.GetHeader("X-Role")
    if role == "" {
      c.AbortWithStatus(401)
      return
    }
    c.Set("user", &User{ID: 1, Role: role})
    c.Next()
  })

  // Vulnerable: dispatches function based on client-supplied name without per-function checks
  r.POST("/resources/:id/invoke", func(c *gin.Context) {
    user := c.MustGet("user").(*User)
    fn := c.Query("fn")
    resID := c.Param("id")
    // No per-function authorization: any authenticated user can invoke any function
    c.JSON(200, gin.H{
      "resource": resID,
      "fn":       fn,
      "status":   "invoked",
      "by":       user.Role,
    })
  })

  // Fixed: enforce explicit per-function permissions
  r.POST("/resources/:id/invoke-fixed", func(c *gin.Context) {
    user := c.MustGet("user").(*User)
    fn := c.Query("fn")
    resID := c.Param("id")
    allowed := map[string][]string{
      "read":   {"user", "admin"},
      "write":  {"admin"},
      "delete": {"admin"},
    }
    roles, ok := allowed[fn]
    if !ok {
      c.JSON(400, gin.H{"error": "unknown function"})
      return
    }
    permitted := false
    for _, r := range roles {
      if r == user.Role {
        permitted = true
        break
      }
    }
    if !permitted {
      c.JSON(403, gin.H{"error": "forbidden for this function"})
      return
    }
    c.JSON(200, gin.H{
      "resource": resID,
      "fn":       fn,
      "status":   "invoked",
      "by":       user.Role,
    })
  })

  r.Run(":8080")
}

CVE References

Choose which optional cookies to allow. You can change this any time.