Broken Object Level Authorization

Broken Object Level Authorization in Go (Gin) [CVE-2026-33031]

[Updated May 2026] Updated CVE-2026-33031

Overview

CVE-2026-33031 illustrates how broken object-level authorization can persist access when an account is disabled, if tokens issued before the disable remain valid and are not rescoped or revoked. Although the CVE describes Nginx UI, the underlying risk-stale tokens or claims enabling access to protected resources after privilege changes-maps directly to Go applications using Gin when object-level checks rely solely on a token without validating the current account state. In practice, an attacker who possessed a token tied to a disabled user could continue reading or modifying resources they owned or were otherwise authorized for, until the token expires or revocation is enforced. This guide anchors remediation to that pattern, showing a concrete Go (Gin) remediation approach aligned with the CVE’s lessons and CWE mappings (CWE-284, CWE-863). It demonstrates how to enforce current user state and prevent object-level access when the account is disabled or privileges are revoked.

Affected Versions

N/A (Nginx UI 2.3.3 and earlier)

Code Fix Example

Go (Gin) API Security Remediation
// Vulnerable and fixed examples in one Gin app
package main

import (
  "net/http"
  "github.com/gin-gonic/gin"
)

type User struct {
  ID      string
  Enabled bool
}

type Resource struct {
  ID      string
  OwnerID string
  Data    string
}

var users = map[string]User{
  "u1": {ID: "u1", Enabled: false}, // disabled account
  "u2": {ID: "u2", Enabled: true},
}

var resources = map[string]Resource{
  "r1": {ID: "r1", OwnerID: "u1", Data: "top secret"},
  "r2": {ID: "r2", OwnerID: "u2", Data: "public data"},
}

func main() {
  r := gin.Default()
  // Both routes share the same auth middleware but differ in the authorization checks
  r.GET("/vuln/resources/:id", authMiddleware(), vulnerableGetResource)
  r.GET("/fix/resources/:id", authMiddleware(), fixedGetResource)
  r.Run(":8080")
}

const headerUserID = "X-Auth-User"

func vulnerableGetResource(c *gin.Context) {
  userID := c.GetString("user_id")
  id := c.Param("id")
  res, ok := resources[id]
  if !ok { c.Status(http.StatusNotFound); return }
  // Vulnerable: authorization is based solely on ownership from the token; no check of user state
  if res.OwnerID != userID {
    c.Status(http.StatusForbidden)
    return
  }
  c.JSON(http.StatusOK, res)
}

func fixedGetResource(c *gin.Context) {
  userID := c.GetString("user_id")
  id := c.Param("id")
  res, ok := resources[id]
  if !ok { c.Status(http.StatusNotFound); return }
  // Fix: verify current user status before object-level access
  u, ok := users[userID]
  if !ok || !u.Enabled {
    c.Status(http.StatusForbidden)
    return
  }
  if res.OwnerID != userID {
    c.Status(http.StatusForbidden)
    return
  }
  c.JSON(http.StatusOK, res)
}

func authMiddleware() gin.HandlerFunc {
  return func(c *gin.Context) {
    userID := c.GetHeader(headerUserID)
    if userID == "" {
      c.AbortWithStatus(http.StatusUnauthorized)
      return
    }
    // In a real app, you would parse a token and validate it here.
    // For this illustrative example, we treat the header value as the principal.
    c.Set("user_id", userID)
    c.Next()
  }
}

CVE References

Choose which optional cookies to allow. You can change this any time.